Our differences of theological opinion quite naturally came up. Our chosen topics of discussion were standard fare for Catholics and fundamentalists. We talked about the divine inspiration and canonicity of the Biblical books, the origin of Catholic feasts and seasons, the veneration of the Saints, and the veneration of images (icons, statues, etc.). We even discussed the Eucharist at some length; the JW's hold the curious view that Jesus only intended it to be celebrated once a year, like the Passover.
However, two topics stood out among the others, the divinity of Christ, and the value of human wisdom, i.e. philosophy.
Anyone who knows anything about the Jehovah's Witnesses knows that they do not believe in the Incarnation, the doctrine that God became man in the person of Jesus Christ. It is precisely belief in this doctrine (along with the attendant doctrine of the Trinity, that there are three Persons in one God) that distinguishes one as "Christian". Thus, all Christians--Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant--as well as the JW's themselves, are in agreement in that the JW's are not, strictly speaking, "Christian".
And, on some level, the fact that the JW's are not Christian, that they do not believe in the divinity of Christ or in the Trinity, makes sense. After all, in addition to the aforementioned doctrines, they also believe in an extreme form of "sola scriptura", the doctrine that "Scripture alone" is the source of Christian faith. This idea, which originated with Martin Luther, has been held by all Protestants in some form or another since the Reformation in the sixteenth century.
For fundamentalists, this doctrine extends even to their method of Biblical interpretation. If one's method is not itself derived from Scripture, then it is unworthy of consideration. Thus, the Western (i.e. Greek) philosophical tradition, which has guided the Church in its interpretation of Scripture for centuries, is casually dismissed as "mere human wisdom". Hence I say that it makes sense that the JW's do not believe in the divinity of Christ or in the Trinity.
After all, Scripture never explicitly says that Christ is divine. Or, to parse it in philosophical terms, Scripture never says that the Father and the Son, while distinct persons, nonetheless share a divine nature. Still less does Scripture say that the Spirit is a distinct person from both the Father and the Son, but an equal sharer in the divine nature. As a Catholic, the ambiguity of Scripture on these essential points does not trouble me. I rely on reason, on "mere human wisdom", to infer these things from the Biblical texts.
As I have said before, in other places, it seems very much that fundamentalists (and JW's certainly come under the "fundamentalist" umbrella) expend much effort convincing themselves that they do not have a "hermeneutic", a method of Biblical interpretation, beyond "open, read, understand". If others have a hermeneutic that leads to conclusions different than their own, then they are exalting "mere human wisdom" above the Word itself! Fundamentalists do not, perhaps cannot, realize that that this attitude is itself a hermeneutic, a method of interpretation.
How to argue with such absurdity? In the end, you can't, at least not in a compelling way. Fundamentalism occurs at the intersection of great passion and great ignorance. And there is no arguing with ignorance. As Scripture says, "Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest you be like him yourself" (Prov 24). And as Jesus says, "Do not throw your pearls before swine," they don't know what to do with them (Mat 7:6). It may sound cliche, but all one can do is love them and pray for them. So when I parted with my new JW friends I smiled, shook their hands, and took their literature with a promise to read it.
Meanwhile, I pray that the Spirit of Truth, who was breathed into Adam, giving him the ability to know and to understand--to philosophize!--may be breathed into them, and into us also, and guide us into all truth.
Check out this video featuring the very lucid and ever-insightful Jimmy Akin on the Church Fathers and Philosophy:
